Haryana and J&K poll results The political landscape in India is undergoing major shifts, with exit polls from Haryana and Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) indicating significant victories for the Congress and its alliance with the National Conference (NC). These results could heavily influence the upcoming Maharashtra assembly elections, especially regarding coalition dynamics and seat-sharing negotiations. Let’s break down how these two regions’ results could set the tone for Maharashtra's political battle.
Exit Polls: Haryana’s Congress Surge
Exit polls across multiple platforms have predicted a decisive win for Congress in Haryana. Surveys by Dainik Bhaskar, C-Voter-India Today, and Republic Bharat-Matrize all forecast Congress winning between 44-62 seats out of the 90-member Haryana Assembly. In contrast, the BJP is projected to secure only 15-32 seats, marking a sharp decline from its current standing.
This turn of events is significant because the BJP has governed Haryana since 2014, with Manohar Lal Khattar at the helm for two consecutive terms. The potential loss in Haryana comes amid key political shifts, including the resignation of Khattar and JJP leader Dushyant Singh Chautala, and the end of the BJP-JJP coalition, which could ripple across to Maharashtra.
Exit Polls: National Conference-Congress Alliance in J&K
Similarly, in Jammu and Kashmir, exit polls suggest a strong performance by the NC-Congress alliance. Polls conducted by C-Voter-India Today, Dainik Bhaskar, and Peoples’ Pulse all place the NC-Congress alliance ahead with 40-50 seats, while the BJP trails with 20-34 seats.
This election holds special significance, as it’s the first assembly election since the bifurcation of J&K into two union territories. The BJP’s anticipated underperformance could further dent the party’s influence, potentially emboldening regional forces and alliances elsewhere, including in Maharashtra.
Impact on Maharashtra Polls: What to Expect
The upcoming Maharashtra assembly elections are crucial, especially with the state’s term ending on November 26. The two primary alliances gearing up for battle are the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), comprising the UBT Shiv Sena, NCP (Sharad Pawar faction), and Congress, and the Maha Yuti Alliance, which includes the BJP, Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde faction), and NCP (Ajit Pawar faction).
In 2019, the BJP won 105 out of 164 seats in Maharashtra, forming a government with the undivided Shiv Sena. However, their performance in the 2024 general elections was disappointing, securing only nine of the 28 Lok Sabha seats they contested in Maharashtra as Haryana and J&K poll results.
If exit polls are accurate and the BJP underperforms in Haryana and J&K, it could complicate the seat-sharing negotiations within the Maha Yuti alliance. Reports suggest the BJP is eyeing 160 of the 288 seats, with the Shiv Sena and NCP seeking 100-105 seats and 60-80 seats, respectively. However, if the BJP’s stature weakens post-Haryana results, its alliance partners may demand a bigger share, potentially leading to a reshuffle in leadership dynamics.
Coalition Leadership and Chief Ministerial Candidates
There is a growing tussle over the chief ministerial candidate within both alliances. While Eknath Shinde is seen as the CM face for the Maha Yuti Alliance, Uddhav Thackeray has suggested that the party with the most seats should not automatically claim the CM post. If the BJP falters in Haryana, it may lose leverage to retain Devendra Fadnavis as the chief ministerial candidate in Maharashtra.
On the MVA side, Congress could feel energized by its Haryana performance and demand a bigger say in seat-sharing talks and leadership roles within the alliance. This could delay or even complicate their negotiations, especially since they have yet to finalize their seat-sharing arrangement.
Read More: IndiGo Tech Glitch Sparks Chaos at Bengaluru Airport: Passengers Compare Scene to ‘Crowded Supermarket’- Click Here
Conclusion
The poll Haryana and J&K poll results could have substantial effects on the Maharashtra assembly elections. A weak showing by the BJP in these states may embolden their coalition partners in Maharashtra to seek more seats and a stronger leadership role. Meanwhile, the Congress, riding high on its success in Haryana and J&K, could push for greater control within the MVA coalition, complicating negotiations.
As the political dynamics evolve, the results from Haryana and J&K may serve as a harbinger for the kind of shifts we can expect in Maharashtra. Both alliances will be carefully watching these developments as they finalize their strategies for what is bound to be a fiercely contested election.
